First, let us understand what Scrum is.
Scrum is a project management approach used primarily for product development, where cross-functional team members work collaboratively in a time-boxed manner, allowing the business to change scope till the planning stage, and create incremental output that can be demonstrated.
Although Scrum was created for software development, many other fields have found it to be useful for managing knowledge based projects. Fields such as education, marketing, research, and others use Scrum effectively.
What Scrum allows you to do is to create a small, potentially shippable product increment at the end of every Sprint.
A Sprint is typically of 3-4 weeks duration, and acts as a mini-project.
Sprint planning is done at the beginning by fixing the scope of work, followed by design, development, testing, and deployment. This approach is called time-boxing.
Scrum itself does not create the product faster, and thus cheaper, though.
What it does is allow you to,
- Build a quality product adaptively
- Change requirements if business side demands
- Pivot the product if early adapters tell you that market doesn’t want it
Scrum is an approach, and its effectiveness is determined by how best it is executed.
You could be following every single ceremony, role, artifact, and best practice there is and still not produce the product required by the market, if the team members do not own the product development effort and work collaboratively.
And, Scrum being a simple approach, can be misused easily if the senior management (and all related stakeholders) do not exhibit the Agile mindset.
Finally, it is not possible to prove that Scrum is cheaper than other project management approaches.
Why?
Because no two projects are the same, each one is completely unique.
People and their backgrounds are different, market conditions, customer expectations, product characteristics, and technology aspects – are all different.
Running two projects using different approaches and having the same yardstick to measure pace and cost savings is not feasible.
Thus, claiming that Scrum based projects are cheaper is a myth.
Having claimed this, there IS a way to increase business cost efficiency.
Adapt a slightly different perspective.
That is, to keep a laser focus on the Scrum principles and create practices that reduce any unnecessary costs – thereby making the Scrum development more economical.
Now that we’ve set the perspective right, let us look at some of the ways to increase the business cost efficiency of Scrum projects.
First, let us understand what Scrum is.
Scrum is a project management approach used primarily for product development, where cross-functional team members work collaboratively in a time-boxed manner, allowing the business to change scope till the planning stage, and create incremental output that can be demonstrated.
Although Scrum was created for software development, many other fields have found it to be useful for managing knowledge based projects. Fields such as education, marketing, research, and others use Scrum effectively.
What Scrum allows you to do is to create a small, potentially shippable product increment at the end of every Sprint.
A Sprint is typically of 3-4 weeks duration, and acts as a mini-project.
Sprint planning is done at the beginning by fixing the scope of work, followed by design, development, testing, and deployment. This approach is called time-boxing.
Scrum itself does not create the product faster, and thus cheaper, though.
What it does is allow you to,
- Build a quality product adaptively
- Change requirements if business side demands
- Pivot the product if early adapters tell you that market doesn’t want it
Scrum is an approach, and its effectiveness is determined by how best it is executed.
You could be following every single ceremony, role, artifact, and best practice there is and still not produce the product required by the market, if the team members do not own the product development effort and work collaboratively.
And, Scrum being a simple approach, can be misused easily if the senior management (and all related stakeholders) do not exhibit the Agile mindset.
Finally, it is not possible to prove that Scrum is cheaper than other project management approaches.
Why?
Because no two projects are the same, each one is completely unique.
People and their backgrounds are different, market conditions, customer expectations, product characteristics, and technology aspects – are all different.
Running two projects using different approaches and having the same yardstick to measure pace and cost savings is not feasible.
Thus, claiming that Scrum based projects are cheaper is a myth.
Having claimed this, there IS a way to increase business cost efficiency.
Adapt a slightly different perspective.
That is, to keep a laser focus on the Scrum principles and create practices that reduce any unnecessary costs – thereby making the Scrum development more economical.
Now that we’ve set the perspective right, let us look at some of the ways to increase the business cost efficiency of Scrum projects.